Monday, February 16, 2009

Taking the Numbers and Running with Them

Chris Jordan’s exhibit “Running the Numbers” was a collection of pieces that were both pleasing to the eye but frightening to the mind. Using items wasted and disposed of in alarming quantities, Jordan created images accompanied by their statistics to convey the carelessness of humans. Whether it was a piece pleasing to the mind or shocking, each one depicted an item’s impact on the earth. Rather than being fluff pieces to place above a couch and never discuss again, these are pieces with a message in mind.


Jordan has stated in interviews that his goal has been to present images that will incite conversation about the state of the world as a result of consumerism. In accomplishing this goal he has absolutely been successful. The waste Americans produce is glaring, and the responsibility it provokes is inescapable. In pieces like “Cans Seurat,” Jordan represents the number of aluminum cans used every thirty seconds in the United States. What makes this image all the more striking is its resemblance to the painting "Sunday Afternoon on the Island of La Grande Jatte,” which represents a scene of enjoyment on a waterfront. What appears to be a serene and beautiful environmental setting is contrasted with the images it is made from. Upon closer inspection and a review of the informational plaque, the viewer is soon disgusted. This dichotomy is absolutely effective, not to mention provocative.


It is clear Jordan’s goal was successfully achieved through his work, but it is equally important to discuss whether or not this goal was appropriate. In other words, is the message he sent valid in the world today, and is it a legitimate concern that a community should be discussing. The response one would most likely give would be a resounding “yes.” With so many concerns circling the globe regarding the earth’s condition, Jordan’s addition to the discussion is appropriate and beneficial. Though the world’s deteriorating condition is discussed on the news, in movies, on billboards, and pamphlets, art is a valuable area in which send a message. One could even argue that art is the best place to incite conversation, since it is possible to present ideas in a unique and startling manner that will catch people’s attention in a way other methods could not. Furthermore, this message is an important one to send. Mother Nature is a part of everyone, and her well-being is essential to the quality our lives.


An important analysis to take into consideration when viewing Jordan’s pieces is their content. This includes its representation, verbal supplements, medium, scale, and context. While the context of his work has already been discussed, the other areas of examination are important to discuss. The content understood as representational was shocking and though-provoking. In other words, his pieces were more than simply toothpicks or cans repeated in multiples; they were full of meaning and statements on consumerism. However, this meaning may not have been possible without the verbal supplementation of the informational plaques with the statistics of the piece described. In this way, the artwork was not as poignant without the plaque and vice versa. Jordan’s medium was also important in the creation of his art, for it would not have been possible without the technology utilized. Because photo programs now enable one to create multiple images and arrange them into a desired composition, Jordan was able to have complete freedom when manipulating his photographs. As a result, the intricacies of his pieces were possible and the communication of his message was all the more powerful. This is directly related to the content of scale. Though his pieces were quite large, they were made from images of minute objects. This dichotomy was often shocking to view and even more surprising when viewed with the knowledge of what it represents.


All in all, Chris Jordan’s work could not have been as effective if it wasn’t for his creativity in utilizing technology, statistics, and aesthetics to provide a visual means of revealing the negative effects of consumerism. His message was clear, concise, meaningful, and flawlessly executed through his provocative images on such a large scale. “Running the Numbers” was certainly the start of many discussions regarding the condition of the earth and humans’ effects upon it.

1 comment:

  1. I like your title! I wish I had seen the interviews where he says his purpose was just to initiate conversations about consumption; I really think that's all his exhibit ultimately does. I don't think many people leave with a renewed commitment to save the world, but if his goal was only to raise awareness and discussion, then I guess he did succeed. Crafty...

    ReplyDelete